Commentary for History of Animation

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

Post #5- The Smurfs: Are they Communists?


The spreading of rumors about cartoons exposing ‘un-American’ and ‘immoral’ values to children is not a new phenomenon that started with the purple Teletubbie, Tinkie Winkie being a homosexual. Deeply conservative groups have been claiming for years Disney leaves hidden sexual messages in his movies such as The Lion King, Aladdin and The Little Mermaid. One such example of this is the claim that the Smurfs cartoons expose children to Communist political theory.

Now before exploring some of the proof found from viewing three hours of viewing the Smurfs on the Boomerang Channel it is worth exploring some ‘literature’ on this subject. Honestly there are not many creditable sources on this subject, but there are some interesting websites, just not ones worth quoting in an academic forum. One of the few creditable ones was an article in the Argus, the newspaper of the Wesleyan University (Middleton, Connecticut). Aaron Rutkoff, the student author, explores how these connections can be made:

1. The leaders of most communist nations were dictators of one sort or another. The Smurfs were no different, living contently under the just albeit stern rule of the absolutist Papa Smurf. Papa Smurf was created in the bearded image of Lenin, and is the only Smurf to wear red a cap and trousers. Red, of course, is color symbol of communism. He is a model of Stalinistic leadership, dealing strictly with any Smurf not acting in accordance with the good of the state.

2. The Smurf village is the picture of the communist ideal. All Smurfs reside in identical huts, eat meals together in communal fashion, wear the same clothes, and have very little private property. Everyone is materialistically the same; it is a perfect example of a classless society.
Furthermore, each Smurf has a role he or she performs for the state and is known by his or her job designation. For example, Handy Smurf fixes things, Cooky Smurf cooks the food, etc. No one Smurf is more or less important the any other Smurf.

3. Though every Smurf has an essential societal role, some are viewed more negatively in the context of the show then others. For example, Greedy Smurf is often ridiculed for eating too much or being too selfish and Vanity Smurf is portrayed as bad for caring only about himself. These two Smurfs, representing both materialism and individualism, cause problems and are often chastised by Smurf society. More proletarian Smurfs, like Hefty and Handy, are always the heroes, never the problems.

4. Brainy Smurf, the intellectual in the village, is often in conflict with Smurf society. He questions the way of Smurf life and is often unhappy. In some episodes, Brainy is sent out of the village to live elsewhere. Brainy represents Trotsky, who was a high ranking official under Lenin but was exiled because of ideological conflicts with Stalin.

5. The natural enemy of the Smurfs is Gargamel and his bumbling cat Azrael. Few people recall this fact, but Gargamel’s sole mission in each episode was to catch the Smurfs and transform them into gold coins. Hence, Gargamel clearly represents the evil of capitalism, a true threat to communist peace and harmony, in the Smurf paradigm.[1]

Through viewing the Smurfs on TiVo
[2] from the Boomerang Channel Rutkoff's conclusions are not only correct, but more can be added. The Smurfs represents of the ideal communistic world. In the episode To Smurf a Thief (1983) Papa Smurfs and some of the other smurfs are taking into the Human village by Artmus the wizard, Papa Smurf says this in reference to the village marketplace (a metaphor for capitalism) "It's all very unsmurfy if you ask me."[3] In another episode, Wedding Bells (1983), a quote about Gargamel, who represents capitalism, says that "He could have had a lovely bride, if he set his greed aside."[4]

Many of the Smurfs episodes feature the theme of working towards a common goal. This represents a basic tenant of Communism, that is communal living and working. In the episode, Smurf Time Capsule (1983) a smurf even states, "a twig by itself is too weak, it's twings in a bundle you seek."
[5] Basically the smurfs felt that unity and working together were the only way to survive. This threatens the captialistic viewpoint that individual hardwork and perserverance is the best means of suriving.

Could this be reading too much into The Smurfs; perhaps the purpose of this communal living setting is really just to teach children to share. The evidence presented shows too much of communistic influences in The Smurfs. This does mean to stop watching The Smurfs? No. They are just cartoons and there is no reason to get up tight about how your children should not be watching them.

[1] Rutkoff, Aaron. (1998, September 22). "Fear and Loathing: Communist Smurf, Be Afraid." Argus online, Wesleyan University: Middleton, CT.
[2] As an aside TiVo is the best invention ever to use to watch cartoons. I was using the really button to show my mom how the mouth on Smurfette was not done correctly and I could go about 2-3 frames per push of a button. It really shows you more about those principles of cartoons that we discussed in one of the beginning classes and I would highly recommend it to view a few parts of cartoons in this way.
[3] To Smurf a Thief. The Smurfs. (1983).
[4] Wedding Bells. The Smurfs. (1983).
[5] Smurf Time Capsule. The Smurfs. (1983).

Photo thanks to The Smurf's Official Website.

8 Comments:

  • I have never thought about it in that way. I could see how some people could see that though. They could be right and just as easily wrong. As you said the Smurf's communal living setting could really just be teaching children to share. Either way i would let my children watch it.

    By Blogger Charla, at 10/05/2005 3:15 PM  

  • Wonderful post! My friends and I always got hung up on the reproductive habits of Smurfs (i.e. how do you have a whole village of these creatures when the only lady smurf is Smurfette, and she was crated by Gargamel, which opens up a ginormous can of worms that could occupy a couple of blog postings). But I digress... :p

    Communism is definitely one of those politcal ideologies that looks great on paper, but could never come into fruition (mainly because human greed is inherent, and that screws up the system). The concepts of community, sharing, and looking out for one's fellow man (or... um... Smurf) should be conveyed to the younger segment of the population. As they grow older, they'll become jaded enough to realize that to live like the Smurfs to the letter is pure fantasy.

    Communism (or Socialism... I have a hard time keeping the two straight) also comes up in another classic of children's entertainment. Ever read L. Frank Baum's Oz books? The classic first installment aside, as the series progresses and you get an idea of the political structure of the Land of Oz, it manifests itself as this socialist matriarchy (with a little bit of democracy thrown in).

    In both situations, it's interesting to note how the idea of utopia is represented- that of a communist state.

    By Blogger Jesse, at 10/05/2005 11:24 PM  

  • Great post! i loved reading it... i never saw the smurfs in that light before and i doubt that i'll see them the same way again... now that you mention it, the smurfs does really seem to have a communist theme going on... whether its all just a coincidence can be left purely up to speculation.

    communism by itself is a pretty good system but, as jesse was able to explain, it'll never work in reality because humans corrupt the system. We as humans are imperfect in nature and one of our biggest flaws is materialism and self-interest. Unfortunately, most humans are too attached to material wealth and power so unless there is a society where every citizen is truly free from any materialistic attachments and greed then, and only then, can communism can exist the way it was intended to be.

    By Blogger emmanuel, at 10/05/2005 11:56 PM  

  • Thanks for the comments so far guys. This post was just meant to expose how the Smurfs show the idealtic upotian version of Communism. This is not a plot to champion or vilify communism, though I do agree with many of your comments that the Smurf version of communism (that is pure communism) sounds like a good system, but will never work due to human nature set in greed and consumption. Sharing, however, and many of the other things Jesse mentioned are good traits that children should learn, thus my real point- parents should not jump to band their children from cartoons they perceive to be unAmerican or immoral, because they could champion some important values that everyone should learn, such as sharing and looking out for one another.

    By Blogger Lauren V, at 10/06/2005 2:52 PM  

  • First things first: it is not "deeply conservative groups" that "claim" that Disney leaves hidden sexual messages in movies; it is that Disney leaves hidden sexual messages in movies. I have seen several of these myself, though I cannot remember all of them. The Little Mermaid's "message," though, is unmistakable and memorable: the father clearly gets an erection at a part of the movie that might encourage that function. In addition, it was only one religious leader who suggested Tinkie Winkie is a homosexual role model. I do believe, though, that Dr. James Dobsen went over the line regarding SpongeBob, when that cartoon's sexuality was questioned.
    Anyway, I am pretty sure that I have never seen an episode of The Smurfs before, and after reading this blog, I can't say that I am sad about this. I absolutely believe that it is plausible for a cartoon to be based around communist ideas, but certainly children aren't grasping this concept. If I had kids, then I would be fine with them watching the show, as long as the association with communism, or politics generally, remains unknown. The reason I would not want them watching The Smurfs with this in mind is for the same reason that I wouldn't want them to watch an "idealistic" representation of Nazi society: evil ideas such as communism and Nazism should not be encouraged by anyone, particulary if this encouragement is aimed at impressionable children. This notion that communism looks good on paper, if only greedy humans could just be nice, is unbelievable to me. The only thing that looks good about communist theory is a lack of poverty. However, this end has to come about through a means, which is giving every person a claim on everyone else's life and work. If you are going to give to everone in "need" (which, of course, has to be defined by someone), then the needy have a right to the production of the "able" (which, of course, also has to be defined), thus turning them into slaves (if one group of people is forced to work for reasons other than their own, then this is the only word that fits). This is why communism doesn't work, and this is its essential evil. It is not because people are simply too "greedy" to voluntarily become slaves, it is because a society based on slavery is bound to fail. This debate is why I believe in discouraging positive portrayals of communist life or thought in America. Some good people, particularly prior to the collapse of the USSR, are attracted to communism because of its intentions, so those of us who know what the results will be feel a need to fight it, when ignoring it is impossible. With The Smurfs, it is very possible because its young viewers don't extract a principle like sharing then extract that and apply it to their political thought. So I would "band" (sic) my kids, through a certain age, from watching certain immoral and unamerican entertainment, but The Smurfs doesn't fit this category until they learn to associate it as such.

    By Blogger Zeke, at 10/07/2005 4:18 PM  

  • The question really that this post alludes to is one that I posed in a comment Zeke's Post #3;

    Is there anything wrong with putting political views or any other covert messages in cartoons?

    Does it make a difference if the children do not understand these messages?


    Obiviously Communism is still a pretty contraversial topic, but Zeke does have a point, someviews that are entirely too radical, such as Nazi setiments, should not be even referenced in cartoons that children should be watching.

    By Blogger Lauren V, at 10/07/2005 5:44 PM  

  • Communist yes even got the red hat, Community and unity are the fundametals of communism. You will notice also the fustration of the other smurfs when they have to pitch in for the slacker smurfs. Showing a downside of communism. like you said work all the time everyone is supposed to contribute. I think it's great to have politcal ideas in cartoons, wether this one is intentional or not remains to be seen, but kids usally aren't consious to political ideals such as communism, although the clarity might come later. i think it is important that children be exposed to as many different thing as possible good or bad and be allowed to take it all in. Have a society where no one voices an opion differnt to your own is dangerous. Why not let cartoons present it in a way they will come to see later.

    By Blogger Will Olivier, at 10/10/2005 6:31 PM  

  • Everyone who says that communism is okay to show in a positive light to kids (or anyone, for that matter), ask yourselves if Nazism would be okay as well. If some creative National Socialist made an entertaining cartoon supporting Nazism, would you say that was okay too? Of course not, and I would join your protest. So why is it okay to idealize communism on television? Communists killed more people than the Nazis, in similarly brutal ways, and they have more support around the world, so one would think that people would shun communist ideas in America even more. These aren't rhetorical questions, I would really like to know why this double-standard exists.

    Will believes that children should be exposed to "as many different things as possible, good or bad." Does anyone else believe this? Most people can think of something that children shouldn't see (I'M NOT SAYING CENSOR). My Nazi excersize should suffice to convince most people against Will's assertion, but if not, there are others (porn, cannibalism, etc.). Some ideas just need to be treated by a sane society as bad. Positive, or even neutral portrayals of certain ideas, in certain contexts (such as kids' shows...) should be unacceptable to our culture. I am thankful that after the collapse of real communism, most people in our country now agree with me, but the "ideal" of communism, unfortunately, will probably never follow the Nazis into the "ashbin of History."

    By Blogger Zeke, at 10/10/2005 7:26 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home